By: Victor Sergienko

Victor Sergienko — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:23:28 +0000

That “supported” is a word people fall under magic of.
Effectively this means that “some issues have a chance to be resolved in the next release in one or two years”.
We had quite a big issues with TFS, and that is what happened.

For NUnit, you have ways greater chance of someone resolving your issue in time, if not yourself.
So, I’d say: (-4) NUnit is opensource and has a good community support.

For second item, it’s also arguable. To turn VS into a good IDE, I demand ReSharper.
Which supports NUnit ways better then VS does for VS.Test.
Which brings us back to “(-2) GUI that shows where test failed is ugly”

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:12:32 +0000

(+5) it’s supported by microsoft
(+5) they can be run by anyone with VS2008, no external dependencies

Comments on: On unit tests in Visual Studio 2008 vs NUnit

By: Victor Sergienko

By: Anonymous